_standard_header _standard_header.cfm
... 718/3063 ...
January 2019    Dennis R. DuBe'     718/3063

$s$ Gamer Types -- Implicit Roles ()

Gamers combine four types: achievers, explorers, socializers and killers ()

Games - It's in the rules! ()

Games - POLITICAL Gamification ()

Games: Deduce the Rules ()

Related Publishers:
736 Aftermath
710 Behavior
772 Catalogs
748 CFS -- Walter Beckert
459 Colorado Rocks
739 Consulting
669 Consulting
709 Content
707 Dennis R. DuBe'
741 Drafts
650 Energy News
344 HTML and Web Skills
742 Key Concepts
716 LFU test
717 LFU Test 2
729 My Latest Clippings
649 New Courses
744 News Panels
721 Position
658 PPV & Gadgets
77 Rocky Mountain Ghost Mines
708 Structure
731 Synthesis
726 Thesis Notes
666 _Aggregation
702 _Determinisms and authors
728 _Papers by Others
668 __Whiteboards
698 ___FanBoy (The Movie)
718 ___Gamification
Games: Deduce the Rules
           #3063   Created 01/01/2012   Updated 10/07/2014

The world of books about gamification turns out to be a game itself. So far, they are all the same book, each with its own little "chart" of what makes a "game". The best chart fudgie so far was the "black box" (Game Frame, aaron dignan, Free Press, 2011), where the game rules reside, Horace's ultimate "deus ex machina".

You got all this other stuff (resources, profiles, story line, anxiety, flow, badges, scoring, game goods, itching powder, etc.) and, oh yeah, the "rules."

I'm postulating that there is a great degree of convergence / linkage between the 'rules' and the game mechanics, and one can be used to deduce the other: if there's a Magic Wand, therefore there is Magic, and the Magic Wand does some Magic by 'Wanding'.

Therefore, he said, as if it made sense, real-world games may be de-constructable from their mechanics to deduce the rules. That deconstruction occurs without regard to the game content! The exclamation point means 'ignore content' when examining a game: content is the clothing that dresses the game mechanics (re. Zynga + the ville engine + the word "Farm").

Those aren't real cows, eh?

Yes, the game is played WITH content, but the game is not ABOUT the content.

So, looking at the current game of politics, involving politicians and politicos and commentators and news networks and candidates, etc., you examine the game sans the message content, but with attention to the 'transaction analysis' of the players vis-a-vis the media and "black box" (the rules).

that's right: more blah blah: it's about power and money, not message content.

It'll turn out, I bet, that there is a very close correspondence between media minutes (or some measure) and intensity of public attitudes (with a much less reliable correspondence between media message and content of public attitudes).

EXAMPLE: public opinion comes from media, indirectly -- not in content, but in awareness and exposure. reflective analysis of legislation reveals the interests of the legislators per se, based on effects of legislation (there are examples; find cites)

such analysis would include: money allocated and spent, effects of programs implemented, interests and industries that profited.


Copyright Dennis R. DuBe'. All rights reserved. PageTwister and PubSource are registered trademarks.