>standard header st="3874"
_standard_header ---Aftermath
---CFS -- Walter Beckert
---Colorado Rocks
---Dennis R. DuBe'
---Energy News
---HTML and Web Skills
---Key Concepts
---LFU test
---LFU Test 2
---My Latest Clippings
---New Courses
---News Panels
---PPV & Gadgets
---Rocky Mountain Ghost Mines
---Thesis Notes
---_Determinisms and authors
---_Papers by Others
---___FanBoy (The Movie)
Structure 27. < !------- test block: issue=Structure id=708 sec1name=Media Morphology imagetmplt=3200 ---------->
     There are always two people: the photographer and the viewer. (ansel adams)             1969-1984

January 2019    Dennis R. DuBe'     708/3874

karl -A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (1859)
           #3874   Created 11/01/2016   Updated 11/01/2016

In the social production of their existence, men inevitably enter into definite relations, which are independent of their will, namely [the] relations of production appropriate to a given stage in the development of their material forces of production. The totality of these relations of production constitutes the economic structure of society, the real foundation, on which arises a legal and political superstructure, and to which correspond definite forms of social consciousness.[3] The mode of production of material life conditions the general process of social, political, and intellectual life. It is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, but their social existence that determines their consciousness. At a certain stage of development, the material productive forces of society come into conflict with the existing relations of production or — this merely expresses the same thing in legal terms — with the property relations within the framework of which they have operated hitherto. From forms of development of the productive forces, these relations turn into their fetters. Then begins an era of social revolution. The changes in the economic foundation lead, sooner or later, to the transformation of the whole, immense, superstructure. In studying such transformations, it is always necessary to distinguish between the material transformation of the economic conditions of production, which can be determined with the precision of natural science, and the legal, political, religious, artistic, or philosophic — in short, ideological forms in which men become conscious of this conflict and fight it out. Just as one does not judge an individual by what he thinks about himself, so one cannot judge such a period of transformation by its consciousness, but, on the contrary, this consciousness must be explained from the contradictions of material life, from the conflict existing between the social forces of production and the relations of production.[4]

Moscow: Progress Publishers


Copyright Dennis R. DuBe'. All rights reserved. PageTwister and PubSource are registered trademarks.